Files
firewallissues/reference/PAN-OS/known/12.1.7.html
T
aaron.axvig 5591362740
Test and deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 38s
Add known issue reference files
2026-07-31 10:41:53 -05:00

255 lines
9.3 KiB
HTML

<table class="table colsep rowsep table-striped">
<!--cq:include script="../../common/tablestack.jsp" /-->
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 25%" />
<col style="width: 75%" />
</colgroup>
<thead class="thead">
<tr class="row">
<th class="entry">
<div class="p">Issue ID</div>
</th>
<th class="entry">
<div class="p">Description</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="tbody">
<tr class="row">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-330836</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
(<tt class="ph tt"
>VM-Series software firewalls with 16 GB of memory and 16 vCPUs
only</tt
>) Starting in PAN-OS 12.1.5, memory usage increases to approximately
6 GB for firewalls running a maximum configuration, compared to
approximately 5 GB in PAN-OS 12.1.2. This increase eliminates the
available memory buffer, leaving no capacity to absorb additional
memory demand during peak load. The firewall may become unstable or
unresponsive under high-load conditions.
</div>
<div class="p">
Firewalls operating with 12 dp cores, or processing more than 512K
sessions, are specifically at risk for memory issues. To ensure
continued stability for firewalls matching this criteria, Palo Alto
Networks recommends an increase of overall memory allocation by 2 GB.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">
PAN-317755<tt class="ph tt">This issue is now resolved. See</tt>
<a
class="xref"
href="/content/techdocs/en_US/ngfw/release-notes/12-1/pan-os-12-1-7-known-and-addressed-issues/pan-os-12-1-7-h1-addressed-issues.html"
title=""
data-scope="local"
data-format="dita"
data-type=""
target="_self"
>PAN-OS 12.1.7-h1 Addressed Issues</a
>
</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
A selective push from Panorama to managed firewalls fail when plugin
configurations reference certain Panorama settings, such as
log-collector groups or access domains.
</div>
<div class="p">
<b class="ph b">Workaround:</b> Perform a full push instead of a
selective push as a temporary measure. Note that selective push
attempts will continue to fail until you upgrade to the release that
includes the fix.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-312143</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
(Firewalls in active/passive high availability (HA) configurations
only) When attempting to synchronize the running configuration with an
HA peer, particularly during script runs involving different topology
builds (e.g., during a smoke runlist), the synchronization process
fails. This results in an error indicating that the running
configuration could not be synchronized with the HA peer.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-311601</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
If the node is seen stuck with fault "session clearing fault". Node
reboot is the workaround to get the node back in online state after
all other fault conditions are removed.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-310328</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
If the node is seen stuck with fault "session clearing fault". Node
reboot is the workaround to get the node back in online state after
all other fault conditions are removed.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-300667</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
Panorama cannot display Threat log entries (Monitor &gt; Logs &gt;
Threat) when the managed log collector is running a lower PAN-OS
release than Panorama. Workaround: Upgrade the log collectors to the
same version as Panorama.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-300230</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
(NGFW Cluster) In an NGFW cluster, your pings to the HSCI-B link might
fail, even when the link indicates it is up. In the event that the
HSCI-A link is brought down or unplugged, the cluster node will
transition to failed state, avoiding split brain as both HSCI links
are down in this case. Workaround: Reboot the cluster node to resolve
the HSCI-B ping issue.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-299562</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
When a client sends a Client Hello with Transport Layer Security (TLS)
1.3 or TLS 1.2, using only the p-192 elliptic curve and some
non-perfect forward secrecy (PFS) ciphers, the firewall discards the
Client Hello. The firewall should allow the connection to proceed
using TLS 1.2, maintaining backward compatibility with previous
releases.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-298083</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
Draft for review: After you change the system mode on an M-700
appliance from Panorama mode to PAN-DB private cloud mode, the snmpd
process fails to work.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-295946</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
When a Panorama appliance (running PAN-OS 12.1.2 or higher) manages
firewalls running PAN-OS versions lower than 12.1.2, and an NTP server
configuration template includes SHA256 or SHA512 as the authentication
mechanism, pushing this template to the firewalls running PAN-OS
versions lower than 12.1.2 will cause the commit operation to fail.
Workaround: Create two separate templates: one for firewalls running
PAN-OS 12.1.2 or higher (which can include SHA256/SHA512
authentication) and another for firewalls running PAN-OS versions
lower than 12.1.2 (which should use other authentication algorithms
such as SHA1, MD5, or Autokey). Then, push the appropriate template to
the corresponding devices from Panorama.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-292601</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
PAN-OS 12.1.2 and later 12.1 releases support a Load Balanced DNS
configuration for an address object. If there are two address objects
with same FQDN, but one object has Load Balanced DNS enabled and other
object has Load Balanced DNS disabled, then the policy match for the
removed IP addresses doesn't work as expected. Workaround: Enable (or
disable) Load Balanced DNS consistently for an FQDN that is used with
multiple address objects.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-289524</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
In PAN-OS 12.1.2 and later 12.1 releases, PAN-OS can obtain resolved
IP addresses from a Load balanced DNS server and use them in a policy
match. However, this functionality does not work as intended when the
DNS cache reuse flag is enabled. When the DNS cache reuse flag is
enabled, the DNS resolution works as if the Load balanced DNS flag
(for an Address object) is disabled.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row rowsep">
<td class="entry">
<div class="p">PAN-283028</div>
</td>
<td class="entry relcol">
<div class="p">
The following error is thrown when an existing template overrides the
SD-WAN configuration followed by the commit and push from Panorama to
the firewall.
</div>
<div class="p">
BGP is invalid. AS number does not fit in 2 byte AS format
</div>
<div class="p">
This issue occurs because different AS formats are present on the
Panorama and the firewall (the firewall configuration is generated by
the SD-WAN plugin). That is, both the hub and branch firewall must
have the same AS format in hub-and-spoke topology. In full mesh
topology, all the firewalls must have the same AS format.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>